Singapore is approaching a pivotal general election, with most observers expecting the polls to be held in May 2025. Yet, as of mid-April, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong has remained conspicuously silent on the actual election date.
This reticence has only heightened political anticipation around what may be the most symbolically significant election since the country’s independence.
For the first time since 1959, no member of the Lee family is poised to assume or hand over the role of prime minister. Former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has formally stepped aside, entrusting the premiership to Lawrence Wong in May last year.
This marks the definitive conclusion of the Lee family’s direct leadership in Singapore’s top political office, a development that has invited scrutiny of the ruling People’s Action Party’s (PAP) future stability.
Wong, now at the helm, faces rising pressure not just from a more vocal opposition but also from within the establishment. In the 2020 general election, the PAP lost ten seats and saw its vote share fall to 61.2 per cent.
A further slide in 2025 could expose fissures in Wong’s leadership, just as it did for his predecessor-designate Heng Swee Keat, who was sidelined after the 2020 campaign underperformed.
Amid these challenges, Wong has adopted what many view as a markedly populist strategy. Government-issued shopping vouchers, subsidies and cash handouts have become central features of his public engagements.
This shift has become so prominent that critics and some members of the public have begun referring to him as “Voucher Wong”.
According to Associate Professor Michael Barr, this populist turn represents a clear break from the ideological ethos of Singapore’s founding prime minister, Lee Kuan Yew, who disdained populism and saw vote-buying as both unnecessary and counterproductive. Barr argues that such pork-barrelling — especially on the current scale — reveals a growing sense of insecurity within the ruling elite.
Michael Barr is a widely recognised scholar on Singaporean politics and governance. An Associate Professor of International Relations at Flinders University in Adelaide, Australia, Barr is a Fellow of the Australian Academy of the Humanities.
His key works include Singapore: A Modern History and The Limits of Authoritarian Governance in Singapore’s Developmental State, which he co-edited with political scientist Lily Zubaidah Rahim.
Barr’s long-standing critique of Singapore’s political system has made him a noted, if sometimes controversial, figure in academic and policy circles.
In his latest commentary for Inside Story, Barr contends that the post-Lee Kuan Yew PAP is characterised by a generation of leaders lacking political instinct, forged not through political struggle but via bureaucratic processes.
Today’s cabinet, he notes, consists largely of technocrats — former civil servants, military leaders, doctors and bankers — selected through interviews, psychological evaluations, and closed-door consultations rather than grassroots political involvement.
This, Barr argues, has resulted in a leadership team that is more managerial than visionary. He contrasts this with Lee Kuan Yew’s own journey — one marked by political risk, direct confrontation, and strategic calculation.
The contrast is most apparent, Barr writes, in the way today’s government leans on both populist tools and authoritarian reflexes, swinging between public giveaways and firm legal actions against opposition figures.
The political climate leading into the election has been shaped by a series of reputational blows to the government, several of which were highlighted in commentary by Associate Professor Michael Barr.
Among the most significant was the conviction of former Minister S. Iswaran in late 2024 for accepting over S$400,000 in gifts. He received a four-month jail sentence followed by home detention — a penalty that, as Barr notes, many in the public have viewed as disproportionately lenient.
Barr also points to broader concerns about the conduct and image of the ruling elite. The PAP has come under scrutiny over media reports detailing ministerial wealth, the use of state institutions in private disputes involving Lee Hsien Loong, and what Barr characterises as a clumsy and politically fraught response to the Gaza war.
Separate from Barr’s analysis, the government is also grappling with the ongoing saga involving a former Nominated Member of Parliament — a case that continues to attract media attention and has raised additional questions about institutional accountability and perceived double standards in the handling of racially sensitive issues.
Most recently, the government faced significant public backlash after it was revealed in December 2024 that Singaporeans’ identity card numbers and other sensitive personal data were accidentally released online.
The incident, part of a failed initiative intended to bolster digital identity security, has drawn criticism across the political spectrum. To date, no minister has been held accountable for the breach.
Meanwhile, opposition parties are contending with pressures of their own. Workers’ Party leader Pritam Singh was fined S$14,000 after being found guilty of misleading a parliamentary committee.
Separately, Lee Hsien Yang — estranged brother of the former prime minister — was granted political asylum in the United Kingdom, after claiming he was a victim of political persecution in Singapore.
Despite mounting criticism and internal challenges, the PAP retains overwhelming structural advantages. Electoral boundaries have been redrawn once again, in a move widely interpreted as gerrymandering.
The mainstream media landscape remains largely favourable to the ruling party, while opposition forces remain relatively fragmented and under-resourced.
Still, Barr argues, the PAP’s legitimacy is no longer underwritten by the strength and stature of the Lee legacy.
The symbolic absence of a Lee family figure in this election — combined with public unease and a more defensive, populist posture — suggests a system entering a new, more uncertain phase.
Whether Lawrence Wong can consolidate his leadership or becomes the latest transitional figure in a faltering succession remains to be seen.
For now, the silence on election dates, the rise of “Voucher Wong”, and the government’s reactive posture all point to a ruling party more vulnerable than it appears.
The post Michael Barr: Singapore’s fragile succession reveals political vulnerability in post-Lee Kuan Yew era appeared first on The Online Citizen.
