Ten journalists from CNN and the BBC have raised significant concerns about pro-Israel bias in their coverage of the Gaza conflict, alleging violations of journalistic principles.
They shared their experiences during an interview with Al Jazeera’s The Listening Post, contributing to a documentary titled Failing Gaza: Behind the Lens of Western Media.
The journalists accused their networks of manipulating reports to favour the Israeli narrative and failing to hold Israeli officials accountable for their actions.
Adam (not his real name), a CNN journalist, expressed his disillusionment after witnessing a shift in editorial policies that, in his view, often compromised accuracy.
He recalled a notable incident in November when CNN’s International Diplomatic Editor, Nic Robertson, accompanied the Israeli military to Gaza’s al-Rantisi Children’s Hospital.
During the broadcast, an Israeli spokesperson claimed the hospital was used by Hamas to conceal Israeli captives and presented a document purportedly supporting this claim.
However, Adam revealed that the document was merely a calendar listing the days of the week in Arabic.
Despite warnings from Arabic-speaking staff about the document’s authenticity prior to the broadcast, the report went ahead, leading Adam to describe it as “an embarrassing moment” for CNN.
He emphasized that this mistake could have been avoided had the network taken its staff’s concerns seriously.
Adam further criticized CNN’s editorial policy, which requires journalists to confirm airstrikes in Gaza with Israeli officials before reporting.
He described this as a clear double standard, noting that no such practice would be tolerated in any other conflict zone.
“We would not be doing this in any other place,” he stated, indicating that reporters wouldn’t ask, for instance, the Russians whether they had bombed a hospital in Kyiv.
Sara, a former BBC journalist, echoed these frustrations regarding the BBC’s approach to interview selections.
She pointed out that Palestinian speakers faced greater scrutiny in the vetting process compared to their Israeli counterparts.
Palestinian guests were often flagged for using terms like “Zionist,” while Israeli speakers faced minimal pushback, even when making unsubstantiated claims.
For example, during an interview with Israeli politician Idan Roll, BBC presenter Maryam Moshiri did not challenge Roll’s claims about Hamas fighters committing horrific acts against children, including unsubstantiated allegations that they had set babies on fire.
This selective vetting appeared to demonstrate an editorial bias against Palestinian perspectives.
BBC staff have expressed growing concerns about the network’s coverage of the ongoing crisis, repeatedly raising issues with the director general.
In February, Al Jazeera obtained an email signed by more than twenty journalists warning that the BBC’s reporting risks aiding and abetting genocide.
The staff emphasized the importance of reflecting the International Court of Justice’s ruling, which found it “plausible” that Israel is violating the Genocide Convention in Gaza and must take measures to prevent genocidal acts.
“We are worried that failure to do so constitutes a public disservice or, at worst, aiding and abetting genocide through story suppression,” the email said, referring to Article III of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of
Genocide.
Over the past year, experts and veteran reporters have raised concerns about the portrayal of Palestinians in mainstream media, accusing outlets of minimizing Palestinian suffering while amplifying Israeli perspectives.
This criticism has led to protests and resignations among some journalists at major outlets, including The New York Times and the BBC, who cite bias in reporting.
In response to these allegations, the BBC and CNN have both denied any bias in their coverage.
Under Al Jazeera’s social media platforms, including YouTube and X (formerly Twitter), many users expressed their gratitude for the network’s reporting on perceived biases in the media’s coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict.
A notable comment came from Ghida Fakhry, a former lead anchor at Al Jazeera English, who questioned when major outlets like the BBC and CNN would cease to propagate Israel’s justifications for what she termed “mass civilian murder” under the pretext of targeting military “command centres.”
She pointed out the lack of evidence produced by these media organizations, highlighting a troubling trend of portraying war crimes as acts of self-defense.
Further amplifying this sentiment, another user remarked on the crucial importance of hearing from journalists with firsthand experience in conflict zones, as this helps illuminate the alleged pro-Israel bias in the reporting of outlets like CNN and the BBC concerning Gaza.
This perspective was echoed by yet another commenter, who noted that CNN and the BBC have faced exposure regarding their biased coverage, which often employs double standards that obscure the reality of Israel’s aggressive actions against the besieged enclave.
Concerns about media bias were pervasive, with one user articulating that the coverage of the Israel-Gaza conflict raises significant alarms.
They emphasized the necessity for more balanced reporting to ensure an accurate and fair portrayal of events.
Another user criticized CNN for its perceived complicity in the genocide against Palestinians, claiming it serves as a champion for Israel alongside prominent publications like the Washington Post and the New York Times.
They shared a poignant narrative of the violence occurring on 7 October, emphasizing that many victims were targeted by Israeli forces during their operations against Hamas.
Criticism of the coverage continued, with a user denouncing CNN and BBC News for their perceived failures to report on atrocities and war crimes, including Israel’s raids on Al Jazeera offices to prevent exposure of these acts.