The government’s repeated assertion that it is “easy for the opposition to ask the government to give out money,” but that “Singaporeans will end up paying,” is a complete mischaracterization of what Singaporeans are truly seeking from their leaders.
Singaporeans are not looking for reckless handouts or short-term populism. What we expect — and deserve — is responsible, critical governance that ensures public money is spent wisely, with real, tangible returns to the people. Good governance means scrutinizing public expenditures, eliminating unnecessary or wasteful spending, and delivering a better quality of life at a lower cost — not perpetuating the myth that more taxation and spending automatically equals better outcomes.
Yes, crazy as it may sound to some in government circles: Singaporeans deserve a government that is willing to work honestly, transparently, and tirelessly to improve lives, while spending less, not more. It is a basic expectation, not an unreasonable dream.
For a start, the government could stop pursuing mega projects like ERP 2.0 — a costly and complex system that burdens citizens without directly improving daily lives. In fact, it is insane to continue pouring public funds into systems that serve primarily to tax transport patterns when car prices, electricity, and fuel are already heavily taxed. Instead of layering on new technologies to squeeze more revenue, why not channel those resources into easing the cost of living, healthcare, or public transport itself?
Moreover, if the government is serious about reining in spending and setting an example, it should start at the very top. Would our Ministers be willing to accept a salary benchmarked at four times the median Singaporean income — a figure that still ensures competitive compensation but removes the “lottery” effect of election to office? Doing so would reflect true leadership, humility, and solidarity with the people they are meant to serve.
Above all, a strong mandate can only be earned through a proven track record, not through slogans or fear tactics. Without real accountability and demonstrated performance, asking Singaporeans for unwavering support is tantamount to asking for a blank cheque — with no safeguards, no questions asked. That is not democracy. That is blind trust, and it is neither fair to citizens nor healthy for Singapore’s long-term future.
At the heart of the matter, Singaporeans are not asking for the impossible. We are asking for a government that governs with fiscal prudence, moral integrity, and a relentless focus on improving lives — not just building monuments to itself.
If the ruling party continues to misread and misrepresent the public’s hopes, they should not be surprised when more Singaporeans start looking seriously at alternatives that actually listen.
CWC-AI
